Microangiopathy of the inner ear, deafness, and cochlear implantation in a patient with Susac syndrome.

CONCLUSION: The cochlear implant was beneficial as an attempt to restore hearing and improve communication abilities in this patient with profound sensorineural hearing loss secondary to Susac syndrome. OBJECTIVE: To report the audiological outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in a young woman with Susac syndrome after a 6-month follow-up period. Susac syndrome is a rare disorder. It is clinically characterized by a typical triad of sensorineural deafness, encephalopathy, and visual defect, due to microangiopathy involving the brain, inner ear, and retina. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of a case at a tertiary referral center. After diagnosis, the patient was evaluated by a multidisciplinary team and received a cochlear implant in her right ear. RESULTS: The patient achieved 100% open-set sentence recognition in noise conditions and 92% monosyllable and 68% medial consonant recognition in quiet conditions after 6 months of implant use. She reported the use of the telephone 3 months after activation.

[Evaluation of non-oncologist physician's knowledge and attitude towards cancer screening and preventive actions]. / Estudo da atitude e do conhecimento dos médicos não oncologistas em relação às medidas de prevenção e rastreamento do câncer.

BACKGROUND: New cancer cases are most often diagnosed by non-oncologist physicians. It is therefore essential for all physicians to be aware of cancer preventive practices and use them appropriately with their patients. METHODS: Questionnaires were administered to 120 non-oncologist physicians of various specialties attending the "Faculdade de Medicina do ABC" who deal directly with adult patients. Replies were collected and classified as appropriate or not according to one of these three cancer prevention guidelines: INCA, American Cancer Society and Canadian Task Force. RESULTS: The percentage of replied questionnaires was 58.3% (70 questionnaires). Mean age of physicians was 33.9 years; 57.1% were women and 10% smokers. Most of the current preventive practices adopted by the participating physicians (45.72% to 100%) regarding the most common and preventable tumors (breast, cervix, prostate, colon and rectum and non-melanoma skin cancer) did not agree with any of the guidelines mentioned above. When questioned about possible impediments for the appropriate practice of cancer prevention, 82.86% reported absence of health education agents working with the population, 77.14% scarceness of knowledge or training concerning prevention, and 70.15% lack of financial support for ordering tests. Frequently, whenever there was disagreement between the guidelines and the physician's current practices, preventive tests were ordered in excess of those recommended by the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians had a tendency to order excessive laboratory tests, an action which can be related to lack of knowledge and to divergence among guidelines. A more intensive educational effort regarding cancer prevention, directed towards teaching physicians in training, seems to be warranted.

Estudo da atitude e do conhecimento dos médicos não oncologistas em relação às medidas de prevenção e rastreamento do câncer / Evaluation of non-oncologist physician's knowledge and attitude towards cancer screening and preventive actions

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o nível de informação e as atitudes preventivas em uso corrente pelos médicos ligados à FMABC. MÉTODOS: Foram entregues questionários para 120 médicos não oncologistas que lidam diretamente com pacientes adultos. RESULTADOS: A taxa de resposta foi de 58,3 por cento. A idade média dos médicos foi de 33,9 anos, sendo 57,1 por cento mulheres e 10 por cento tabagistas. As práticas preventivas para os cânceres mais comuns (mama, colo de útero, próstata, colorretal e pele não-melanoma) foram analisadas e comparadas com as recomendadas pelos consensos adotados (INCA, Sociedade Americana de Cancerologia e Força-Tarefa Canadense). Observou-se que a maioria das práticas (45,72 por cento a 100 por cento) não se adequou a nenhum deles. Sobre possíveis barreiras para o adequado exercício da prevenção do câncer, 82,86 por cento considerou falta de agentes educadores em saúde para a população, 77,14 por cento poucos conhecimento ou treinamento e 70,15 por cento falta de verba para custear exames. Houve uma tendência ao excesso de pedidos de exames de rastreamento. CONCLUSÕES: As práticas preventivas utilizadas pelos médicos entrevistados são heterogêneas e, em sua maioria, não preconizadas pelos consensos de condutas preventivas consultados, o que pode ser relacionado tanto à sua falta de conhecimento em relação a estes consensos como às divergências entre eles. Dessa forma, faz-se necessário um esforço educativo enfatizando a importância da prevenção do câncer no aprendizado e na prática médica.